USPTO serial 85207989
FARMER'S BASKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FARMER'S BASKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen fruit, packaged frozen fruit in individual sections, either whole or cut in pieces; frozen fruit purées, frozen fruit purée on a stick in a hand held container or in a tube; frozen vegetables, packaged frozen vegetables, whether with or without sauce; frozen vegetable purées | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |