USPTO serial 85208206
IT'S 11 PM IN THE CLOUD. DO YOU KNOW WHERE YOUR DATA IS?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IT'S 11 PM IN THE CLOUD. DO YOU KNOW WHERE YOUR DATA IS??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Business technology software consultation services; Computer consultation; Computer consultation in the field of computer security; Computer hardware and software consulting services; Computer programming consultancy; Computer security consultancy; Computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; Computer software consultancy; Computer software consultation; Computer software consulting; Consultancy in the field of software design; Consultancy with regard to webpage design; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting in the field of configuration management for computer hardware and software; Consulting in the field of information technology; Consulting in the field of IT project management; Consulting in the field of product development in the field of Regulatory-compliant software, hardware, solutions and processes; Consulting in the field of software and product development in the field of Regulatory-compliant software, hardware, solutions and processes; Consulting in the field of software development and product development in the field of Regulatory-compliant software, hardware, solutions and processes; Consulting in the field of software development in the field of Regulatory-compliant software, hardware, solutions and processes; Consulting in the field of telecommunications technology; Consulting services for others in the field of design, planning, and implementation project management of Regulatory-compliant software, hardware, solutions and processes; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Consulting services in the field of collection of evidence for forensic purposes; Consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of hosting computer software applications; Consulting services in the field of identification, support, and implementation of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of providing online, non-downloadable software and applications; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Consulting services in the field of the design of Regulatory-compliant software, hardware, solutions and processes; Design, development and consulting services in the field of software for content management; Information technology consultation; Innovation consulting services, namely, advising others in the areas of product development; IT consulting services; Product development consultation; Technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services; Technological consultation in the field of selecting Regulatory-compliant software, hardware, solutions and processes suitable for their intended uses; Technological consultation in the technology field of Regulatory-compliant software, hardware, solutions and processes; Technological planning and consulting services in the field of Regulatory-compliant software, hardware, solutions and processes; Technology consultation and research in the field of Regulatory-compliant software, hardware, solutions and processes; Technology consultation in the field of Regulatory-compliant software, hardware, solutions and processes | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Consultation in the field of data theft and identity theft; Consultation services concerning homeland safety and security issues; Consulting and legal services in the field of privacy and security laws, regulations, and requirements; Consulting services concerning legal matters in the medical field; Consulting services in the field of homeland security; Consulting services in the field of listing and tracking of foreign and domestic government regulatory requirements, for obtaining permits and regulatory compliance; Consulting services in the field of maintaining the security and integrity of databases; Consulting services in the field of state and federal regulatory compliance requirements for personnel safety; Regulatory compliance consulting in the field of data and process management; Security consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Tylney Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Tylney Group, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named IT'S 11 PM IN THE CLOUD. DO YOU KNOW WHERE YOUR DATA IS?
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |