USPTO serial 85208548
GREEN MYLK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4106976Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2012
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GREEN MYLK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Valley Center, CA
Valley Center, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua D. Thomas
JOSHUA D. THOMAS LAW OFFICES OF JOSHUA D. THOMAS5507 CRESCENT LNMEMPHIS, TN 38120-2449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vegetable and nut based beverages for use as a nutritional and dietary supplement | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |