USPTO serial 85211741
SNOOKY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNOOKY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan M. Harris
ALAN M HARRIS LAW OFFICE OF ALAN M. HARRIS3278 WILSHIRE BLVD.#901LOS ANGELES, CA 90010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Action figures and accessories therefor; Ball-jointed dolls; Balloons; Bath toys; Bendable toys; Board games; Bobblehead dolls; Card games; Children's play cosmetics; Christmas tree ornaments; Costume masks; Dolls; Dolls and accessories therefor; Dolls' clothes; Dog toys; European style dolls; Fantasy character toys; Girls' festival dolls and their fittings; Jigsaw puzzles; Mobiles for children; Paper dolls; Party games; Stuffed dolls and animals; Talking dolls; Theatrical masks; Toy animals; Wind-up walking toys | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 2013 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 9, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 8, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |