Drawing for RETURN ON SUBSURFACE DATA

USPTO serial 85211853

RETURN ON SUBSURFACE DATA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RETURN ON SUBSURFACE DATA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacqueline Zion

JACQUELINE ZION PEARL COHEN ZEDEK LATZER, LLP1500 BROADWAY FL 12NEW YORK, NY 10036-4068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software in physical and downloadable form, namely, computer programs for use in relation to exploration and production of oil, gas and subsurface assetsACTIVE—
041Training services in the oil and gas exploration and production industryACTIVE—
042Computer consulting services relating to the use of software in the field of exploration and production of oil, gas and subsurface assets; Geophysical, geological, petrophysical and reservoir services in the oil and gas exploration, production and subsurface asset management industry, namely, prospect generation and evaluation, data processing and imaging, analyzing, visualizing, and interpreting, seismic, geological, geophysical, and petrophysical data, earth modeling, reservoir characterization, petroleum engineering, and well planning; Design and implementation of software and technology solutions in the field of exploration and production of oil and gas and subsurface assetsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance