USPTO serial 85213098
CLINICAL HYDRATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 10, 2013
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLINICAL HYDRATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Oak Brook, IL
Oak Brook, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
Burton S. Ehrlich LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S. Michigan AvenueSuite 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medicated lip care preparations, medicated topical creams, lotions, gels, balms, and ointments for human use for lip and skin dryness, cold sores, and for lip and skin care | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 10, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 16, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 1, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 7, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |