USPTO serial 85213351
ASSURED CONTENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASSURED CONTENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. Blair Forrest
E. BLAIR FORREST PUSHOR MITCHELL LLP301 - 1665 ELLIS STREETKELOWNA, BC, V1Y2B3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software that creates electronic databases used to track, log and manage the removal and replacement of contents, namely, from restoration projects within the restoration services industry; Downloadable electronic publications offering information in the field of computer software, namely, brochures, user manuals, pamphlets, magazines and booklets | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications offering information in the field of computer software, namely, brochures, user manuals, pamphlets, magazines and booklets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |