USPTO serial 85213976
BOOGIE BEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 7, 2015
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOOGIE BEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Jordan
Frank J. Jordan Jordan and Koda, PLLC230 Park Avenue, Suite 460New York, NY 10169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear, namely, men, women and children shoes; overshoes, galoshes, men work shoes, rubber shoes, leather shoes, vinyl shoes, straw shoes; shoes for sport and recreation, namely, basketball shoes, basketball sneakers, boxing shoes, rugby shoes, golf shoes, cyclist shoes, gymnastic shoes, tennis shoes, handball shoes, deck shoes for boating, bowling shoes, volleyball shoes, football shoes and studs therefor, baseball shoes and cleats therefor; slippers and sandals, namely, ballet slippers, bath sandals, beach sandals, wooden sandals; boots, namely, foul weather rubber boots, ski boots, hiking boots; hockey boots without blade, riding boots, women boots, children boots, baby shoes, baby booties, men work boots; welts for boots and shoes, tips for footwear; non-slipping devices for footwear, namely, non-slip soles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 8, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |