Drawing for INSUREVIEW

USPTO serial 85215228

INSUREVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSUREVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Femal

Michael J. Femal Muchshelist191 N. Wacker Dr.Suite 1800CHICAGO, IL 60606-1615

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Conducting electronic discovery services via global computer networks for lawyers and corporations; Consulting services in the field of the design of document review systems; Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; Data conversion of electronic information; Design and development of electronic data security systems; Electronic legal discovery consulting services; Electronic scanning of documents for document review, indexing, consulting and e-discovery for businesses and law firms; IT consulting services; IT integration services; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for document review and indexing; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to specialize in document review, indexing, consulting and e-discovery for businesses, law firms and insurance industry; Providing an online network service that enables users to share data in the field of e-discovery for businesses and law firms; Providing an online non-downloadable Internet-based system application featuring technology enabling users to review e-discoveryACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 25, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 27, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 26, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 15, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jan 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 14, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance