USPTO serial 85217187
SERVE NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SERVE NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for processing point-of-sale transactions, namely, magnetically-encoded stored value and debit cards; magnetically-encoded, machine-readable, bar-coded, stored value and debit cards; magnetically-encoded identifying cards | ACTIVE | Mar 28, 2011 |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, credit and charge card services, consumer stored value and debit card transaction processing services; providing electronic processing of stored value and debit card transactions and providing electronic payments via a global computer network; financial services, namely, electronic processing, verification, and settlement of sales transactions using online accounts; stored value and debit card transaction verification and settlement services; electronic payment processing services, namely, electronic processing of stored value and debit card and online account payment data; stored value and debit card services; providing financial information via a global computer network; and consultation services related to the foregoing | ACTIVE | Mar 28, 2011 |
| 038 | Providing electronic transmission of stored value and debit card and online account payment data via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Mar 28, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Express Marketing & Development Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by American Express Marketing & Development Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named SERVE NETWORK
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2012 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 18, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 18, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2011 | GSPS | NOTIFICATION OF SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | GSPR | SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 3, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |