USPTO serial 85220002
INTELLIGENT RESPONSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4156486Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 12, 2012
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTELLIGENT RESPONSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric fire, smoke and burglar sensors and alarms; electronic light barriers and infrared barriers for motion detection, ultrasound and vibration transmitters and receivers and electric central signaling units all for use in intrusion and fire alarm systems, and in building management and automation systems that are used for the central monitoring, regulating and controlling of heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting and smoke extraction appliances, power consumption and supply, automatic doors, elevators and moving staircases; Electronic combustion gas, gas, smoke, aerosol, fire and temperature detectors for use in fire alarm systems; Electric sensors for detecting hazardous substances, namely, biological, chemical, radioactive materials; Electric sensors for detecting and identifying the movement or presence of people or goods, access control monitoring systems for intrusion prevention; Electric transmitters and receivers for audio and video signals relating to building fire safety and building management and automation systems; Voice evacuation systems relating to safety and security, namely, computer software for the transmission of audible signals to give live or pre-recorded instructions for evacuation; Fire alarm and emergency evacuation devices, namely, audible and visible notification appliances, strobes, sirens, bells, horns, and speakers; multi-media information systems relating to safety and security, namely, visual and audio visual, digital and analog, wired and wireless incident notification appliances, including technologies for communicating information within buildings, on-campus, and off-site, namely, wired and wireless telephony apparatus; fire-extinguishers; automatic fire extinguishers using water, water mist, chemical agents or gas; computer software for analyzing data collected by fire, smoke, building automation, weather system and intrusion detection devices, and for planning and controlling evacuation, rescue and recovery in case of fire safety, security and other life safety threat incidents, namely, aggressions, shootings, explosions, chemical and hazardous material spills, weather-related and natural disasters and for real time analysis and planning of optimal methods of reducing risks to persons and property; computer software for managing building fire safety, intrusion prevention and other life safety systems, namely, ventilation, smoke control, low voltage power distribution, lighting, video surveillance, access control systems; computer software for simulation of fire, smoke and gas propagation; software for the simulation of evacuation scenarios; computer hardware and computer software to enable cross-vendor, cross-function and cross-discipline communication between devices used in intrusion, fire alarm, building management and automation systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2012 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 3, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |