USPTO serial 85220287
LIVELEAF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIVELEAF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN CARLOS, CA
SAN CARLOS, CA
SAN CARLOS, CA
LIVELEAF, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION
SAN CARLOS, CA
Other trademarks owned by LIVELEAF, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN S. BOYER, PH.D.
BRIAN S. BOYER, PH.D. SYNDICATED LAW PCSTE 105493 SEAPORT CTREDWOOD CITY, CA 94063Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | All purpose disinfectants; all purpose disinfectants for use as an antimicrobial for inhibiting the growth of mold, mildew, bacteria and fungus on various surfaces for use in homes, hospitals, restaurants, and public facilities; disinfectants for hygiene purposes; disinfectants for sanitary purposes; medical cleansers for skin and wounds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by METAACTIVE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by METAACTIVE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LIVELEAF, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LIVELEAF, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named LIVELEAF
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 31, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |