USPTO serial 85220442
AR GAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AR GAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerald E. Nagea, Reg. No: 29,418
JERALD E. NAGEA, REG. NO: 29,418 CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PLLC1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-1344UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing images via communication with hand-held game apparatus with liquid crystal displays; providing images via communication with consumer video game apparatus; providing videos via communication with hand-held game apparatus with liquid crystal displays; providing videos via communication with consumer video game apparatus; providing music and sound via communication with hand-held game apparatus with liquid crystal displays; providing music and sound via communication with consumer video game apparatus; planning, managing and conducting video game events; providing games via communication with hand-held game apparatus with liquid crystal displays; providing games via communication with consumer video game apparatus; providing games for consumer video game apparatus; providing games for hand-held game apparatus with liquid crystal displays; providing games via telecommunication network; providing games via communication networks; arranging and conducting competitions for video game players; providing non-downloadable online computer games and video games that can be accessed and played over computer networks and global communications networks; providing electronic games that may be accessed network-wide by network users; providing information on video games, computer games and related products; providing online information and news in the field of video games; providing online news, hints and other information in the field of video games through a global computer network, a satellite system, a digital or analog cable system, or a telecommunications network; providing temporary use of non-downloadable electronic sample game programs; providing temporary use of non-downloadable video game programs provided via the Internet, a global computer network, digital or analog cable systems, or a telecommunications network; entertainment services, namely, providing images in the forms of electronic games, game supplies, musical videos, related screen shots, photographs, and other entertainment-related multimedia content; entertainment services, namely, providing videos, music, sound, and movies via communication, namely, a global computer network, digital cable systems, and telecommunications networks; entertainment services, namely, providing videos, music, sound and movies via communication with video game apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |