Drawing for CLEAN & CLEAR AND CONFIDENT

USPTO serial 85220659

CLEAN & CLEAR AND CONFIDENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAN & CLEAR AND CONFIDENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jake D. Feldman

JAKE D. FELDMAN JOHNSON & JOHNSON1 JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PLZNEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08933-0002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Skin cleanser; non-medicated astringents; body wash; facial wash; body scrub; facial scrub; skin moisturizers; skin creams and cosmetic, facial and body cleansing wipes; sunscreen; body moisturizers and cosmetic, non-medicated cosmetics; lip balms, lip glosses and face powdersACTIVE—
005Medicated skin cleanser; medicated facial and body wash and medicated facial and body scrub; medicated nose strips for the treatment of blackheads, medicated acne patches, acne treatment preparations, medicated astringents, medicated skin moisturizers and skin cleansersACTIVE—
016Disposable wipes not impregnated with chemicals or compounds for use as cosmetic blotting sheets for absorbing facial oilACTIVE—
021Exfoliating and cleansing devices, namely, battery-operated hand-held skin exfoliating and cleansing units used to clean and exfoliate the skin; facial exfoliating padsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 29, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 26, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 24, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance