USPTO serial 85221332
KIDS RHEUM A NETWORK FOR CHILDREN WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4533874Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 20, 2014
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KIDS RHEUM A NETWORK FOR CHILDREN WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Arthritis Foundation, Mid-Atlantic Region, Inc.
Washington, DC
Other trademarks owned by Arthritis Foundation, Mid-Atlantic Region, Inc.
Arthritis Foundation, Mid-Atlantic Region, Inc.
Washington, DC
Other trademarks owned by Arthritis Foundation, Mid-Atlantic Region, Inc.
Arthritis Foundation, Mid-Atlantic Region, Inc.
Washington, DC
Other trademarks owned by Arthritis Foundation, Mid-Atlantic Region, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Elizabeth Davis
Mary ELizabeth Davis Spotts Fain, PC411 E. Franklin StreetSuite 600Richmond, VA 23111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, hats and caps, athletic uniforms; hooded sweat shirts; long-sleeved shirts; polo shirts; short-sleeved or long-sleeved T-shirts; sweat shirts; shirts for infants, babies, toddlers and children; infant and toddler one piece clothing; scarves; visors; bandanas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 26, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Arthritis Foundation, Mid-Atlantic Region, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Arthritis Foundation, Mid-Atlantic Region, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Arthritis Foundation, Mid-Atlantic Region, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named KIDS RHEUM A NETWORK FOR CHILDREN WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 20, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 17, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |