USPTO serial 85221817
BASSMAN SPINNERBAITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4436865Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 19, 2013
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BASSMAN SPINNERBAITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bexhill, AU
Bexhill, AU
Bexhill, AU
Bexhill, AU
Bexhill, AU
Bexhill, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Short
420 North McKinley Street, Suite 111Corona, CA 92879UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Discount services, namely, retail store and wholesale distributorship services featuring fishing tackle, fishing lures and imitation bait, and sales promotion services; retailing of goods, namely, online retail store services featuring fishing tackle, fishing lures and imitation bait; retail store services featuring sales of fishing tackle, fishing lures and imitation fishing bait | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 20, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Casey, Glen P.,
- Other trademarks owned by Casey, Glen P.,
- Other trademarks owned by Casey, Glen P.,
- Other trademarks owned by Casey, Susan J.
- Other trademarks owned by Casey, Susan J.
- Other trademarks owned by Casey, Susan J.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BASSMAN SPINNERBAITS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 4, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 29, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |