Drawing for MAMI LA CUISINE DE GRAND'MERE! PLUS DORE PLUS DE GOUT MORE COLORED MORE TASTE TOGGOU MAME! GRAND'MA COOKING! BOUILLON EPICES EN POUDRE SPICES SEASONING POWDER GRAND'MA COOKING!

USPTO serial 85222045

MAMI LA CUISINE DE GRAND'MERE! PLUS DORE PLUS DE GOUT MORE COLORED MORE TASTE TOGGOU MAME! GRAND'MA COOKING! BOUILLON EPICES EN POUDRE SPICES SEASONING POWDER GRAND'MA COOKING!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHINER, MARK W
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MAMI LA CUISINE DE GRAND'MERE! PLUS DORE PLUS DE GOUT MORE COLORED MORE TASTE TOGGOU MAME! GRAND'MA COOKING! BOUILLON EPICES EN POUDRE SPICES SEASONING POWDER GRAND'MA COOKING!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sylvia A. Petrosky

SYLVIA A PETROSKY SYLVIA A PETROSKY ATTORNEY AT LAW2273 SMITH RDAKRON, OH 44333-2924UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029seasoning bouillon in powderABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2012MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 25, 2012ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 25, 2012OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 25, 2012OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 10, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 10, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 30, 2011PBTQWITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST—
May 18, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 4, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance