USPTO serial 85222333
PAYU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAYU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LS Hoofddorp, NL
LS Hoofddorp, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gina Durham
Gina Durham DLA Piper LLP US555 Mission Street, Suite 2400San Francisco, CA 94105-2933UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software enabling and processing electronic payments and transferring funds to and from others; authentication software for use in release of payments; wired and wireless computer peripherals; computer security device, namely, a non-predictable code calculator for accessing a host data bank computer; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; magnetically encoded credit cards and debit payment cards; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin operated apparatus; cash registers; calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, electronic funds transfer for the purchase of products and services offered by others, all via electronic communication networks; clearing and reconciling financial transactions via electronic communication networks; providing a wide variety of payment and financial services, namely, credit card services, issuing credit cards and lines of credit; electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bills data and bill payments data, bill payment services, namely, providing guaranteed payment delivery, charitable fundraising provided via electronic communication networks; foreign exchange transactions; home banking; electronic funds transfer; online banking, telephone banking services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software for electronic payment processing, electronic funds transfer processing, authentication processes; design and development of application programming interfaces (API) software; providing information in the field of computer software and computer software design and development; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Providing financial fraud protection and prevention and dispute resolution services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MIH Allegro BV
- Other trademarks owned by MIH Allegro BV
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named PAYU
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |