USPTO serial 85223029
PHYSICIAN HEALTH PARTNERS COLLABORATE, INNOVATE, MAKE A DIFFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHYSICIAN HEALTH PARTNERS COLLABORATE, INNOVATE, MAKE A DIFFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business and management consulting for healthcare providers and related businesses; Business assistance services, namely, assisting health care facilities and other companies with customer follow-up to improve customer outcomes and satisfaction through the use of telecommunication devices and computer networks with automated interaction and data feedback, monitoring and compilation capacity; Business collaboration services, namely, providing a national computer-based networking web site for health care educators and medical educators to collaborate across disciplines to help improve health care education and medical education; Business management and consulting services for the health care industry, namely, customer service, accounting services, and marketing services; Business management and consulting services for the health care industry, namely, customer service, accounting services, and web-based advertising and marketing services; Business management and consulting services for the health care industry, namely, providing industry expertise and supplier partnerships; Business services provided to the healthcare industry, namely, the collection, reporting, and analysis of healthcare quality data for business purposes; Business services, namely, independent medical management services for self-funded major medical health plans; Collecting and analyzing claims data from healthcare organizations for business purposes; Consulting in the fields of healthcare operations management and hospital operations management; Consulting services in the cost and payment management of health care; Consulting services, namely, to employers, community organizations, brokers and beneficiaries, related to consumer information regarding health care plan options, products and programs in the field of managed care and state and federal medical care programs; Cost management for the health benefit plans of others; Cost management for the health care benefit plans of others; Electronic data collection and data submission services for business purposes in the fields of medicine and healthcare; Health care cost containment; Health care cost review; Health care utilization and review services; Healthcare management service organization (MSO) services, namely, providing practice organization, management and administrative support services to individual physicians or small group practices; Managed care services, namely, electronic processing of health care information; Managed care services, namely, utilization review and pre-certification services; Medical claims management services, namely, electronic re-pricing of physician, hospital, and ancillary medical care provider transactions via the global information network; Medical claims management services, namely, receiving, data entering, and re-pricing of transactions that are originated by physicians, hospitals, and ancillary medical care providers; Requesting health care provider privileges from health care institutions on behalf of physicians and health care providers | PARTIALLY PAID | Oct 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| May 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |