USPTO serial 85223285
4D SCULPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 4D SCULPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter A. Matos
PETER A MATOS MALLOY & MALLOY PA2800 SW THIRD AVENUEHISTORIC CORAL WAYMIAMI, FL 33129-2317Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | cosmetic surgery, namely, liposuction procedures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |