USPTO serial 85223810
BERGUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BERGUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew D. Ray, Esq
MATTHEW D. RAY, ESQ DROHAN TOCCHIO & MORGAN, P.C.175 DERBY ST STE 30HINGHAM, MA 02043-4055UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Hamburger sandwiches; Sandwiches, namely, hamburgers | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Bar and restaurant services; Cafe and restaurant services; Cafe-restaurants; Cafeteria and restaurant services; Carry-out restaurants; Fast food and non-stop restaurant services; Fast-food restaurant services; Fast-food restaurants; Fast-food restaurants and snackbars; Hotel and restaurant services; Hotel, bar and restaurant services; Hotel, motel, restaurant, bar and catering services; Hotel, restaurant and bar services; Hotel, restaurant and catering services; Restaurant; Restaurant and bar services; Restaurant and bar services, including restaurant carryout services; Restaurant and cafe services; Restaurant and catering services; Restaurant and hotel services; Restaurant reservation services; Restaurant services; Restaurant services featuring sandwiches; Restaurant services featuring hamburgers; Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises; Restaurant, bar and catering services; Restaurants; Self service restaurants; Self-service restaurants; Take-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |