USPTO serial 85223846
AIRMAN MONARCHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4729773Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 5, 2015
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AIRMAN MONARCHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Providing non-medical personal assistant services for others in the nature of planning, organizing, coordinating, arranging assisting individuals to perform daily tasks; Advisory services in the field of home security systems; Airline passenger security screening services; Airport baggage security inspection services; Assisting in the locating of children for security and safety purposes using a global positioning system; Baggage inspection services for security purposes; Baggage security inspections for airlines; Compiling inventories of personal items for others for insurance or security purposes; Computer security services in the nature of providing an internet trust center, namely, computer security assurance and administration of digital keys and digital certificates; Computer security services in the nature of providing authentication, issuance, validation and revocation of digital certificates; Computerized security services, namely, electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting on suspicious and abnormal patterns of point of sale activity indicating theft, fraud, or other criminal activity; Consultancy services in the field of home security; Consultation services concerning homeland safety and security issues; Consulting and legal services in the field privacy and security laws, regulations, and requirements; Consulting services in the field of maintaining the security and integrity of databases; Consulting services in the field of national security; Consulting services in the field of homeland security; Control of building environmental access and security systems; Drug, alcohol and DNA screening for security and employment purposes; Electronic monitoring services for security purposes in the field of military science and personnel security; Electronic signature verification services provided in connection with citizens petitions, initiatives, recalls and referenda for security purposes; Emergency response alarm monitoring services, namely, monitoring of alert devices by a remote monitoring center for the dispatch of emergency public health and security services and notification to third parties; Fiduciary compliance consulting, namely, consulting in the field of federal securities regulations governing investment advisory activities; Home security monitoring using wireless and wired sensors for glass breakage, motion detectors, cameras, pool alarms, water alarms and shutoff valves, gate, door and window contact sensors, severe weather alarms; Investigation of assets, credit reports, fiscal assessments, and collection reports for security or authentication purposes; Leasing of electronic tracking devices for use in connection with homeland security; Making pet identification tags available to others for security or location purposes; Monitoring burglar and security alarms; Monitoring of computer systems for security purpose; Monitoring of security systems; Monitoring of security systems used in electronic tracking for use in connection with homeland security; National security consultation; Personal security consultation; Providing a web site featuring information in the field of security; Providing a web site featuring information on the development of privacy, security and data governance law; Providing audio and video monitoring of premises for businesses and governmental agencies for security purposes; Providing information concerning homeland safety and security issues; Providing information in the field of building security via the Internet; Providing information in the field of personal physical security; Providing news concerning homeland safety and security issues; Rental of security surveillance equipment; Security clearance for preparation of identification cards; Security consultancy; Security control of persons and luggage in airports; Security due diligence services for individuals or businesses traveling or opening an office overseas, in the nature of detailed foreign country briefings, vetting of local personnel, establishing host country government contacts, and providing information on sustainable security measures overseas; Security guard services; Security guarding for facilities; Security inspection services for others; Security printing, namely, encoding identification information on valuable documents and products; Security service, namely, providing a list and photographs of all furniture and belongings in a residence and business, as a record to the owner of the contents in the event of a disaster; Security services for buildings, namely, providing physical access to properties via a remote call-in locking device; Security services for individuals and business persons traveling internationally and domestically, namely, providing foreign country security briefings, embassy information for security purposes and security reports; Security services, namely, water vulnerability assessment services; Security services, namely, providing security assessments of physical locations, information systems, and working environments; Security services, namely, providing executive protection; Security services, namely, conducting recovery operations for the recovery of property and personnel; Security services, namely, providing a website notifying individuals of a changed status or condition of a sensing device in a security system via electronic message alerts; Security services, namely, providing security assessments for businesses and governmental agencies; Security services, namely, providing security assessments for businesses and governmental agencies; Security services, namely, armed escorts and security personnel for businesses and governmental agencies; Security threat analysis for personal protection purposes; Security threat analysis for protection personal property; Security threat analysis for protection public safety; Verifying and monitoring the security credentials of event staff for various private and public sports or entertainment events to ensure public safety; and Video monitoring of facilities, viewable through a global computer network, security purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 13, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GREGORY MARQUIS ST.JAMES I
- Other trademarks owned by GREGORY MARQUIS ST.JAMES I
- Other trademarks owned by GREGORY MARQUIS ST.JAMES I
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named AIRMAN MONARCHY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2022 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 13, 2021 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| May 11, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2021 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |