USPTO serial 85224666
ROYAL COUNTY OF BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROYAL COUNTY OF BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark G. Kachigian
MARK G KACHIGIAN HEAD JOHNSON KACHIGIAN PC228 W 17TH PLACETULSA, OK 74119 4608UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Pens, pencils, writing instruments, drawing instruments, stationery, note paper, writing paper, gift wrapping paper, envelopes, greeting cards, post cards, magazines, story books and picture books, drawing rulers, painting sets for children; posters, calendars, diaries, photograph albums, stickers, shipping labels, printing labels, paper labels, sketch pads, paper party decorations, paper napkins, pen and pencil cases, facial tissue, stationery-type portfolios, document portfolios, and art and photograph portfolio cases | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named ROYAL COUNTY OF BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |