USPTO serial 85224803
VIRTUAL TATTOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4581952Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2014
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIRTUAL TATTOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FORT MILL, SC
ST. JAMES, NY
ST. JAMES, NY
St. James, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Snyder
MICHAEL F SNYDER VOLPE AND KOENIG PC30 S 17TH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Tattoo shop management systems comprising computer hardware, computer peripherals, and computer software, for use in managing all aspects of tattoo shops, namely, customer profile collection and processing, advertising, inventory control, design review and selection processes, stencil creation, document management, form selection and generation, provision of legal notices, invoicing, and billing; software for use in all aspects of operating and managing tattoo shops, namely, namely, customer profile collection and processing, advertising, inventory control, design review and selection processes, stencil creation, document management, form selection and generation, provision of legal notices, invoicing, and billing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 30, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INK PROJECTS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KING OF INK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KING OF INK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Artistic Tattooing, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VIRTUAL TATTOO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 27, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 7, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |