USPTO serial 85225956
E ERIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E ERIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Modzeleski
James R. Davis, II ARENT FOX LLP1717 K STREET, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish; poultry and game; meat products, namely, offal, salami, Turkish style fermented sausage, sausage, smoked tongue; meat extracts; dried, cooked, smoked, canned, or frozen meat products, namely, offal, salami, Turkish style fermented sausage, sausage, smoked tongue; consommés; bouillons; processed seafood, namely, mollusks and crustaceans; dried, cooked, canned, frozen vegetables; vegetable juice for cooking; dried legumes, namely, beans, peas, chickpeas, lentils, soy beans; instant soups; convenience foods, namely, potato chips, nut-based salted snack foods and potato-based salted snack foods; milk, fruit milk and milk products, namely, cheese, butter, yogurt, yogurt containing fruit, cream, milk powder; milk-based beverages with chocolate; edible oils and fats, namely, olive oil, corn oil, maize oil, cotton seed oil, margarines and butter; eggs and egg powders; dried, cooked, smoked, canned, or frozen fruits; jams, marmalades; processed agricultural products, namely, beans, peas, chickpeas, lentils, soy beans | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Dried cooked rice, dried grains, namely, bulgur, dried corn, dried oats, dried rye grain, dried bran; processed agricultural products, namely, rice, bulgur, corn, oat, rye grain, bran and processed grain; macaroni, ravioli, Turkish ravioli, noodles; breads, flat breads, pitas; pizzas and Turkish pizzas; biscuits, crackers, wafers, cakes, tarts; desserts with syrup, namely, baklava, söbiyet, kadayif and tulumba; sorbets, milk desserts, namely, puddings, custard, caramel custard, rice pudding; Noah's pudding, milkshakes, yeast; baking powder; vanilla; flour, namely, bran flour, oat flour, rye flour, barley flour, processed semolina; breakfast cereals; food starches; malt for food purposes; processed wheat bran; granulated sugar, cube sugar, powdered sugar; flour and processed cereal for use in making popcorn, corn flakes, oat meal and breakfast cereals; convenience foods, namely, corn chips, tortilla chips, popcorn, grain-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed agricultural products, namely, beans, peas, chickpeas, lentils, soy beans, rice, bulgur, corn, oat, rye, bran; unprocessed horticultural products, namely, raw cereals, dried plants and grasses, plant seeds, flower seeds and vegetable seeds; livestock, live hatching eggs; fertilized eggs for hatching; live plants; animal feed stuffs and additives for animal feed stuffs for non-medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ERISLER GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by ERISLER GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named E ERIS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 25, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 25, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |