USPTO serial 85225969
MAXIMIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXIMIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WALTER A. HACKLER, Ph.D.
H DANIEL FULLER CADDEN FULLER LLP114 PACIFICASUITE 450IRVINE, CA 92660 0755Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Sunless spray tanning equipment, namely, power-operated sprayers that deliver cosmetic and sunless tanning lotions, solutions and liquids to the skin | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |