USPTO serial 85226110
THE SPARTANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SPARTANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Candace Myers
Candace Myers Colony Pictura123 10th StreetSan Francisco, CA 94103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Composition of music for others; Consultation and advice regarding musical selections and arrangements for sound recordings and live performances; Entertainment and education services in the nature of live dance and musical performances; Entertainment and educational services, namely, providing advice and information for music, video and film concept and script development; Entertainment in the nature of an on-going special variety, news, music or comedy show featuring a musical band broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances by a musical band; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, and musical, variety, news and comedy shows; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, namely, musical band, rock group, gymnastic, dance, and ballet performances; Entertainment information services, namely, providing information and news releases about a musical artist; Entertainment services by a musical artist and producer, namely, musical composition for others and production of musical sound recordings; Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances; Entertainment services in the nature of presenting live musical performances; Entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the field of music; Entertainment services, namely, an on-line activity where you create your own music videos; Entertainment services, namely, non-downloadable ringtones, pre-recorded music, and graphics presented to mobile communications devices via a global computer network and wireless networks; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring non-downloadable musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials featuring a musical band; Entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable playback of music via global communications networks; Entertainment services, namely, providing nondownloadable prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; Entertainment, namely, live music concerts; Entertainment, namely, live performances by a musical band; Live performances by a musical group; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music, video, and films; Multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games, music, and electronic publications; Music composition and transcription for others; Music composition for others; Music production services; Music publishing services; Music selection services for use in television, film, radio and video games; Music transcription for others; Music video production; Music-halls; Organization of exhibitions for musical entertainment; Planning arrangement of showing movies, shows, plays or musical performances; Post-production editing services in the field of music, videos and film; Presentation of musical performance; Production of musical sound recording; Production of musical videos; Production of sound and music video recordings; Providing a website featuring information in the field of music and entertainment; Providing a website for entertainment purposes where users can view and post comments, videos, music featuring a musical band; Providing an Internet website portal featuring links to musical artist websites and music performance ticket information; Providing an Internet website portal in the field of music; Providing ratings for television, movie, music, video and video game content; Provision of information relating to live performances, road shows, live stage events, theatrical performances, live music concerts and audience participation in such events; Provision of information relating to music; Publication of musical texts; Publishing of books, e-books, audio books, music and illustrations; Theatrical and musical floor shows provided at discotheques and nightclubs; Theatrical and musical floor shows provided at performance venues | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |