Drawing for BRANSON'S ROADHOUSE B

USPTO serial 85228089

BRANSON'S ROADHOUSE B

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRANSON'S ROADHOUSE B?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James J. Bitetto

SUSAN PAIK TUTUNJIAN & BITETTO PC425 BROADHOLLOW ROADSUITE 302MELVILLE, NY 11747-4701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Cafeteria and restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 23, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 18, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 29, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 9, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 8, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 6, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 20, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 13, 2011GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 13, 2011GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 21, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 30, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 2, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance