USPTO serial 85228528
CCI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CCI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl P. Leb
CHERYL P. LEB KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP201 MAIN ST STE 2500FORT WORTH, TX 76102-3129UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PUBLISHING OF PRINTED AND ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC LEARNING PROGRAMS, BOOKLETS, BOOKS, BROCHURES, POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONS, CALENDARS, DVDS, REMINDER CARDS, SELF-EXAM CARDS, AND PLANNERS, IN THE FIELD OF WOMEN AND INFANT HEALTHCARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |