USPTO serial 85229182
WHEN IT MATTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2014
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WHEN IT MATTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Oliveira
KEVIN OLIVEIRA ODIN FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN PC1775 WIEHLE AVENUE, SUITE 400RESTON, VA 20190-5159UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | software consulting services; planning, designing, and configuring computer networks; installation, maintenance, and repair of computer software; computer network and software technical support services; remote computer network technical monitoring and software maintenance services; help desk services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; analysis and design of technical security and firewall systems for computer networks; development of software applications; website design; database design and development; design and development of computer software; website hosting; computer consultation in the areas of technical support, network security, and the use and operation of computer software; computer consultation in the areas of computer network infrastructure systems analysis and integration; remote network monitoring; remote computer backup services; design and development of computer hardware and computer software; computer consultation services; computer services, namely, computer system design and development; computer hardware and software integration for computer systems; computer programming services; computer software design services; computer systems analysis; computer systems design services; software development; providing temporary use of non downloadable computer software for computer systems analysis; database development; maintenance of software, software systems and internet web sites; information technology consultation services; computer consultation on the computer-related aspects of information technology security and e-commerce; providing information over local and internal computer networks and the internet on the subjects of computer analysis, computer systems design services, and software and software development; integration of computer systems and networks into multiple systems and networks; providing computer and computer network security services in the nature of implementing technical security and firewall systems, namely, updating and upgrading of systems and computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; back-up services for computer hard drive data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 4, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 2, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2012 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |