USPTO serial 85230566
PLUS 1 BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLUS 1 BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After-sun gels; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; Beauty creams; Beauty creams for body care; Beauty gels; Beauty lotions; Beauty masks; Beauty milks; Beauty serums; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cleansing creams; Cleansing milk for cosmetic purposes; Cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes; Coloring preparations for cosmetic purposes; Concealers for face; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic hair dressing preparations; Cosmetic hand creams; Cosmetic masks; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic nourishing creams; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic pencils; Cosmetic preparations; Cosmetic preparations for bath and shower; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for eye lashes; Cosmetic preparations for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; Cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; Cosmetic preparations, namely, firming creams; Cosmetic preparations, namely, firming lotions; Cosmetic products in the form of aerosols for skin care; Cosmetic rouges; Cosmetic skin fresheners; Cosmetic sun oils; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; Cosmetic sunscreen preparations; Cosmetic suntan lotions; Cosmetic tanning preparations; Cosmetic white face powder; Cosmetics; Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Cosmetics and make-up; Cosmetics in general, including perfumes; Cosmetics, namely, compacts; Cosmetics, namely, lip primer; Cosmetics, namely, lip repairers; Eyebrow cosmetics; Face and body beauty creams; Face creams and cleansers containing benzoyl peroxide for cosmetic purposes; Face creams for cosmetic use; Facial beauty masks; Foams containing cosmetics and sunscreens; Lotions for cosmetic purposes; Make-up kits comprised of cosmetics; Mineral powder for use in cosmetic body wrap applications; Non-medicated cosmetic skin care preparations consisting of organic coconut virgin oil and coconut virgin oil; Non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; Oils for cosmetic purposes; Pencils for cosmetic purposes; Self-tanning preparations; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin conditioning creams for cosmetic purposes; Skin fresheners; Solid powder for compacts; Suntan oils for cosmetic purposes; Tanning and after-sun milks, gels and oils; Tanning gels; Tanning oils; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes; Wrinkle-minimizing cosmetic preparations for topical facial use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |