USPTO serial 85231422
SCULPTED EERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEETE, KYLE C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCULPTED EERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
JAMES R MENKER HOLLEY & MENKER, PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233-1715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Custom fit in-ear hearing devices and custom-fit hearing protection devices, namely, custom-fit headsets, headphones, ear buds, earphones and earpieces, not for medical use; Custom-fit hearing protection devices, namely, custom-fit wired and wireless communications headsets for telephones and mobile telephones and closed communications circuits; Custom-fit hearing devices, namely, headsets, headphones, ear buds, earphones and earpieces, not for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Custom-fit personal sound amplification products for medical use; hearing aid module for medical use and not for medical use comprised of an earplug with filters and amplification modules with digital signal processing capabilities; hearing aids | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 31, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 29, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |