Drawing for BIMODAL GLIDEWAY

USPTO serial 85231447

BIMODAL GLIDEWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIMODAL GLIDEWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard C. Litman

RICHARD C. LITMAN LITMAN LAW OFFICES, LTD.8955 CENTER STMANASSAS, VA 20110-5403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Transportation services, namely, providing a highway for use by others; Transportation services, namely, providing a highway system for use by others; transport of vehicles by railACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 23, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance