USPTO serial 85231741
LOCKBOX E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOCKBOX E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Anna McCoy
B. ANNA MCCOY ALLEMAN HALL MCCOY RUSSELL & TUTTLE LLP806 SW BROADWAY STE 600PORTLAND, OR 97205-3335UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Document storage apparatus, namely, blank digital storage media; electronic storage devices, namely, external computer hard drives; software, namely, computer software for client side encryption, compression, real-time transfers, real-time collaboration, real-time notification, confidential messaging, privacy control, access control, information sharing, information transmission security, storage transmission security, data transmission security, end-to-end security of information, and multi-party communications; digital vault, namely, digital storage media and external computer hard drives with software encryption | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunication networks; electronic transmission of data featuring real-time transfers, real-time collaboration, and real-time notification services; providing private and secure real time electronic communication over a computer network; communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; multi-party communication services, namely, provision of confidential electronic messaging; access control services, namely, provision of access to the Internet and data or documents stored electronically in central files for remote consultation | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Storage services for archiving electronic data; electronic data storage, namely, storage services for archiving electronic data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer systems and wireless computer networks for the transmission of data for client side encryption, compression, real time transfers, real time collaboration, real-time notification, confidential messaging, and multi-party communications; design of computer systems and networks; maintenance and support services for computer systems and networks; custom design, development, and consulting services for computer systems and networks; data encryption services; secure file sharing services, namely, providing a website featuring technology enabling users to upload and download electronic files; cloud computing featuring software for use in electronic storage; data encryption and cryptography services; file sharing services, namely, providing a website featuring technology enabling users to upload and download electronic files; end-to-end information security services, namely, computer security consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Providing a web site featuring information on the development of privacy, security and data governance law | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lock Box Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Lock Box Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named LOCKBOX E
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |