USPTO serial 85232236
CLIENTRAK!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4242632Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2012
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLIENTRAK!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kyle A. Fletcher
Kyle A. Fletcher Law Office of Kyle Fletcher, P.C.PO Box 11735Charlotte, NC 28220UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING ONLINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING DATA USED TO MANAGE RECORDS AND FOR MANAGING INFORMATION OF BUSINESSES, SAID BUSINESSES IN THE FIELDS OF PERSONAL GROOMING FOR PEOPLE AND DOMESTIC ANIMALS AND BEAUTY-RELATED SERVICES FOR PEOPLE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 3, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |