USPTO serial 85232464
ISISPOS TOTALLY WIRELESS TOTALLY RESTAURANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISISPOS TOTALLY WIRELESS TOTALLY RESTAURANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Unionville, Ontario, CA
Unionville, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Flynt
RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN LLP1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036 1649UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software, namely, point of sale software for the hospitality industry for mobile retail inventory management, operating computer systems, processing of sales transactions, transmission of payment information, reservation management, kitchen orders management, consumer loyalty, gift card delivery, kiosk management, online ordering, digital menu books and table management | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, computer software design for the hospitality industry | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |