USPTO serial 85232702
MOMMY DOCS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOMMY DOCS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUNNY S. NASSIM
SUNNY S. NASSIM JACOBSON, RUSSELL, SALTZ, NASSIM & DE LA TORRE LLP10866 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1550LOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital media, namely, pre-recorded video cassettes, digital video discs, digital versatile discs, DVDs, audio compact discs, downloadable audio and video recordings, and high definition digital discs featuring information for entertainment and educational purposes in the fields of women's health and obstetric health; Downloadable electronic newsletters and video recordings in the field of women's health and obstetric health; Downloadable electronic publications, namely, books, magazines, articles, newsletters and worksheets in the field of women's health and obstetric health; Electronic publications, namely, books, magazines, articles, newsletters and worksheets featuring information on women's health and obstetric health recorded on computer media; Computer application software, namely, software for providing information regarding women's health and obstetric health, for mobile phones, handheld mobile digital electronic devices in the nature of personal digital assistants, portable media players, handheld computers, electronic personal organizers, computers, computer peripheral devices, mobile digital electronic devices for recording, organizing, transmitting, manipulating, and reviewing text, data, image, and audio files, tablet computers, electronic book readers, digital audio and video players | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment and educational services, namely, the presentation of seminars, lectures, workshops and panel discussions, and ongoing television shows and radio talk shows, television programming segments and ongoing television programs in the fields of women's health and obstetric health broadcast over television, cable and satellite, video podcasts and webcasts; Entertainment services in the nature of providing newsletters via email in the field of women's health and obstetric health; Providing on-line journals, namely, blogs about women's health and obstetric health via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MPH Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MPH Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MOMMY DOCS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 20, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |