USPTO serial 85233256
M³
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 9, 2015
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN,JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with M³?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Accipiter Radar Technologies Inc.
Fenwick, Ontario, CA
Accipiter Radar Technologies Inc.
Fenwick, Ontario, CA
Accipiter Radar Technologies Inc.
Kenwick, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven A. Abreu
Steven A. Abreu Abreu Karol LLC770 Legacy Place, 2nd FloorDedham, MA 02026United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radars; sensors, namely, radar sensors consisting of various combinations of radar transceivers, antennas, radar-activated deterrent devices in the nature of audio speakers and lasers for non-medical purposes, automatic identification electronic sensors, electronic proximity sensors, and optical sensors; data and signal processors, target fusion data processors and computer software embedded in data processors for automatic scene understanding, or interpretation and analysis; detectors, namely, radar, weather radar, and clutter and target motion detectors for automatically detecting targets; trackers, namely, target data processors for generating radar tracks and extracting data on targets; target information systems consisting of a combination of data processors, computer servers, computer software for the databasing, manipulation and integration of geographic information, and target data storage and management devices in the nature of RAID-based hard drive backup systems for providing information about radar targets; radar networks consisting of combinations of radars, radar sensors, data and signal processors, radar target detectors, radar target data processors, target information systems, namely, computer network servers, geographical information systems, namely, global positioning systems (GPS) and geographical information target data processors and computer servers; target analytics data processors; alarming data processors that provide automatic alerts of situations of interest; monitoring systems for target data visualization consisting of computer hardware used by operators to access and display various combinations of radar, weather, and clutter data, target detections and tracks, target information, alarms and sensor data; and surveillance systems for target intelligence gathering and traffic patterning consisting of various combinations of radars, radar sensors, data and signal processors, target motion detectors, radar target data processors, geographical information systems and target information systems, namely, computer hardware, target analytics and alarming data processors, and monitoring systems in the nature of computer hardware to provide operators with situational awareness on targets of interest including real-time location information, intelligence information, and intrusion alarms for use in the maritime domain, border security, port security, coastal security, critical infrastructure protection, search and rescue, sense and avoid for air traffic control of unmanned aerial systems, bird strike prevention with aircraft, and deterring birds away from agricultural, mining and energy sites | ACTIVE | Feb 6, 2014 |
| 045 | Surveillance and monitoring of target activity and user-defined alarms in the nature of alarm response and verification services; providing intelligence information in the field of homeland safety and security issues to local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies; automatic alarm monitoring and alerting services; services in the nature of tracking vessels, aircraft, vehicles and birds for safety and security purposes; electronic monitoring, namely, providing monitoring traffic patterns information on vessels, aircraft, vehicles and birds for safety and security purposes; bird strike prevention services in the nature of providing information to characterize habitat utilization by birds in the vicinity of aircraft through tracking, locating and monitoring services providing alerts of hazardous bird activity to operators; automatic bird deterrent services in the nature of detecting the presence of hazardous bird activity and triggering deterrent devices to repel the birds; security services, namely, monitoring of security systems in the nature of perimeters, zones, and facilities for intrusions and alerting operators; law enforcement services, namely, analyzing data in computer databases for criminal activity ; border enforcement services, namely, monitoring and electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting on suspicious and abnormal patterns of guarding for border activities; critical infrastructure protection services, namely, monitoring and electronically monitoring guarding, detecting and reporting on suspicious and abnormal patterns of for facility activities; port security services, namely, monitoring and electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting on suspicious and abnormal patterns of guarding for ports activity; coastal surveillance services; surveillance and monitoring of alarms services in support of search and rescue, air traffic control, homeland security, defense and natural resource management; hazard mitigation services, namely, safety consulting services in the fields of wildlife hazard assessments and abatement procedures; homeland security services, namely, consulting services in the field of homeland security; waterside security, namely, monitoring and electronically security guarding maritime facilities; intelligence gathering services, namely, providing target analysis and information for detective investigations and maritime domain awareness services, namely, providing situational awareness information on, above and near water in the nature of surveillance services | ACTIVE | Feb 6, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Accipiter Radar Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Accipiter Radar Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Accipiter Radar Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named M³
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 15, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 15, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 19, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 12, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 17, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |