USPTO serial 85233397
PARIS TOKYO MILANO ROMO W DOUBLEU BEVERAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARIS TOKYO MILANO ROMO W DOUBLEU BEVERAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Seoul, 121-829, KR
Seoul, 121-829, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC1314 Texas, 21st FloorHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Acanthopanax tea, artificial coffee, barley leaves tea, barley tea, black tea, caffeine-free coffee, chicory based coffee substitute, Chinese matrimony vine tea, chocolate based beverages with milk; chocolate-based beverages, cocoa, cocoa beverages with milk, cocoa products, namely, candy with cocoa; cocoa spreads, cocoa-based beverages, coffee, processed coffee, coffee beverages with milk, coffee substitutes, namely, artificial coffee or vegetable preparations for use as coffee, coffee flavored syrup for use in making beverages, coffee-based beverages, fruit teas, ginseng tea, green tea, ground coffee beans, iced tea, tea for infusions, not medicinal, instant coffee, lime tea, milk chocolate, oolong tea, roasted coffee beans, sage tea, stamina enhancing tea, sweet flag tea, tea, tea leaves, tea substitutes, unroasted coffee, vegetal preparations for use as coffee substitutes | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Aerated water, apple juice beverages, apple juices, syrups for making cola soft drinks, essences for making non-alcoholic beverages, frozen fruit beverages, non-alcoholic fruit extracts for beverages, fruit juices, fruit powders for beverages, fruit syrups for beverages, fruit-flavored beverages, ginger ale, ginseng extracts for beverages, ginseng juices beverages, ginseng powders for beverages, grape juice beverages, guarana drinks, isotonic beverages, kvass non-alcoholic beverages, lemon squash, lemonades, lithia water, mandarin orange juices, milk of almonds beverage, mineral water, mineral water beverages, non-aerated water, non-alcoholic aperitifs, non-alcoholic beverages made with fruit flavor, non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices, non-alcoholic cider, non-alcoholic cocktails, non-alcoholic fruit extracts, non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages, non-alcoholic fruit nectars, non-alcoholic honey-based beverages, orange juice beverages, orgeat, pastilles for effervescing beverages, peanut milk soft drink, pineapple juice beverages, powders for effervescing beverages, preparations for making aerated water, preparations for making beverages, preparations for making effervescent beverages, preparations for making mineral water, rice nectar beverages, sarsaparilla soft drink, seltzer water, sherbets beverages, soda drinks, soda pop, soda water, soft drinks, namely, sodas, syrups for beverages, syrups for lemonade, table waters, tomato juice beverage, unfermented grape must, vegetable juices beverages, vegetable juice or fruit based processed beverages, waters beverages, whey beverages | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |