USPTO serial 85233655
FIVE GENERATIONS DISTILLING PISCO UNDERTHE PRISTINE CHILEAN DESERT SKIES WAQAR ARTISAN-MADE PREMIUM PISCO D.O. PROUDLY PRODUCED AND BOTTLED IN TULAHUEN. VALLE DE LIMARI, CHILE FROM MUSCAT GRAPES ALC/40% (80 PROOF) 750 ML
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 8, 2014
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with FIVE GENERATIONS DISTILLING PISCO UNDERTHE PRISTINE CHILEAN DESERT SKIES WAQAR ARTISAN-MADE PREMIUM PISCO D.O. PROUDLY PRODUCED AND BOTTLED IN TULAHUEN. VALLE DE LIMARI, CHILE FROM MUSCAT GRAPES ALC/40% (80 PROOF) 750 ML?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Provincia de Limari, CL
Provincia de Limari, CL
Provincia de Limari, CL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew T. Rissler
Andrew T. Rissler Patel & Almeida PC22647 Ventura Blvd., Ste 531Woodland Hills, CA 91364United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | (Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(e)) Alcoholic beverages except beers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pisquera Tulahuen S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Pisquera Tulahuen S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Pisquera Tulahuen S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named FIVE GENERATIONS DISTILLING PISCO UNDERTHE PRISTINE CHILEAN DESERT SKIES WAQAR ARTISAN-MADE PREMIUM PISCO D.O. PROUDLY PRODUCED AND BOTTLED IN TULAHUEN. VALLE DE LIMARI, CHILE FROM MUSCAT GRAPES ALC/40% (80 PROOF) 750 ML
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 8, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 8, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 30, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |