USPTO serial 85234045
QUIQIE Q BBQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUIQIE Q BBQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tim Baker
TIM BAKER SMUGLERS LLP480 LISGAR STOTTAWA, K1R5H3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | (Based on Intent to Use) Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |