Drawing for INTELLIZING

USPTO serial 85234580

INTELLIZING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HESIK, APRIL ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTELLIZING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Solomon

STEVEN J. SOLOMON PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 E 9TH ST STE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing services for the uploading and storage of customer-assembled information via a computer network; transmitting customer-assembled information via a computer network; information transmission via electronic communications networks; providing access to electronic sites featuring customer-assembled information; dissemination of customer-assembled information to a targeted audience via a computer network; information-assembly services, namely providing advice and assistance for the creation and assembly of information to be disseminated to targeted audiences via a computer network; tabulating and analyzing feedback from targeted audiences to whom customer-assembled information is disseminated via a computer network; utilizing feedback from targeted audiences to whom customer-assembled information is disseminated via a computer network in providing the aforesaid information-assembly servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 2, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 6, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 9, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance