USPTO serial 85234871
Serial No. 85234871
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 85234871?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip C. Schroeder
Philip C. Schroeder Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP1900 Main Street, 5th FloorIrvine, CA 92614-7321UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | full line of spa and salon products, namely, hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, hair sprays, mousse, non-medicated shine serum, spray shine, styling cream, volumizing spray gel, anti-frizz lotion, volumizing spray, smoothing gel, root volumizer, curl defining gel, styling putty, mousse wax, pomade, styling paste, curl booster, curl activator, styling lotion, non-medicated straightening balm, and wax, and body care products, namely, facial cleansers, facial creams, facial emulsions, facial masks, facial scrubs, astringents for cosmetic purposes, cosmetic pads, eye makeup remover, skin cleansing lotion, skin cleansing cream, skin cream, skin emollients, skin lighteners, skin masks, skin moisturizer masks, skin toners, skin whitening cream, and wrinkle removing skin care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |