USPTO serial 85234965
DIVINE FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4956074Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2016
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIVINE FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CERRITOS, CA
CERRITOS, CA
CERRITOS, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat-based snack foods; Potato-based snack foods; Snack mix consisting of primarily of processed nuts, seeds; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed nuts and salted squash seeds and also including toasted corn; Tofu-based snacks; Vegetable-based snack foods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 29, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 10, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |