USPTO serial 85235259
LEADS BY EXAMPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEADS BY EXAMPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Tally Eitan
A. TALLY EITAN EITAN MEHULAL LAW GROUP18106 KITCHEN HOUSE CTc/o EDNA EISEMANNGERMANTOWN, MD 20874-2422Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; Computer software for updating and enriching existing contact information, namely, business and personal contact information; Computer software for use in customer relationship management; Computer software for application and database integration | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Consulting and providing information in the fields of database management, customer relationship management; market research services and customer research services, namely, analysis of customer behavior and habits; data compiling and data and information analyzing in the field of business management and customer relationship management; business research in the field of customer service and customer relationship management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Online provision of web-based software, namely, providing non-downloadable software for database management in the field of customer service and customer relationship management, non-downloadable software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; non-downloadable software for updating and enriching existing contact information, namely, business and personal contact information; online provision of non-downloadable software for application and database integration; providing a website featuring technology enabling the collection of information for business, namely, collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Leadspace Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Leadspace Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LEADS BY EXAMPLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |