USPTO serial 85235907
CHATCHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4335323Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 14, 2013
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHATCHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
jupiter, FL
Jupiter, FL
Jupiter, FL
SEATTLE, WA
CAMELLIA, NSW, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morris E. Turek
Morris E. Turek YourTrademarkAttorney.com167 Lamp and Lantern Village#220Chesterfield, MO 63017-8208Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer network configuration services; Computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in discussions, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, and engage in social networking; Computer services, namely, creating indexes of information, sites and other resources available on computer networks; Computer services, namely, creating, maintaining, designing and implementing web sites for others and hosting the web site of others on a computer server for a global computer network; Computer services, namely, integration of computer software into multiple systems and networks; Computer services, namely, providing an interactive web site that allows users to consolidate and manage social networks, accounts, and connections to existing and emerging application programming interfaces (APIs); Hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; Providing a website that gives users the ability to review various print, photographic, graphic image, and audio and video content and utilize a custom template to provide input, likes, dislikes, edits, changes, modifications, opinions, suggestions, and comments and engage in social, business and community networking; Providing an on-line network environment that features technology that enables users to share data; Providing customer-defined generated content and content of others automatically selected and customized based on the known or estimated geographical location of an Internet, mobile telephone or other wired or wireless digital network based customer; Providing information at the specific request of end-users by means of telephone or global computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 21, 2012 |
| 045 | Internet based social networking and social introduction services; On-line social networking services; Online social networking services provided through a community website; Social introduction agencies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 21, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Social Network Marketing Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CHATCHING INC
- Other trademarks owned by CHATCHING INC
- Other trademarks owned by CHATCHING INC
- Other trademarks owned by CEDAROCK CAPITAL PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CHATCHING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 14, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 3, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 14, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |