USPTO serial 85235974
TAILGATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAILGATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert D. Buyan
ROBERT D BUYAN STOUT UXA BUYAN & MULLINS LLP4 VENTURESTE 300IRVINE, CA 92618-7384Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Chicken wings packaged with seasoning, marinade and/or sauce; Refrigerated food package combinations consisting primarily of chicken wings in combination with seasoning, marinade and/or sauce | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |