Drawing for BABY BYTES

USPTO serial 85236479

BABY BYTES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BABY BYTES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill J. Chalmers

JILL J. CHALMERS BRYAN CAVE LLP90 SOUTH CASCADE AVENUE, SUITE 1300COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Online communication services, namely transmission and delivery of greeting cards, messages and messages featuring greetings, which incorporate various types of media, in the nature of video clips, still images, graphics, animations, music, sound effects and voices, and are transmitted and received via global computer networks, mobile telephone networks, and digital television networks, and video-on-demand systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 7, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 30, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 26, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 18, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2013EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 8, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 8, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 23, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2011EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Nov 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance