Drawing for MOMMY MADE

USPTO serial 85236502

MOMMY MADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOMMY MADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill J. Chalmers

JILL J. CHALMERS BRYAN CAVE LLP90 S CASCADE AVE STE 1300COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903-1615UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site that features blogs in the field of babies and parenting; providing a web site for entertainment purposes where users can view and post collections of video clips and still photographsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 13, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 29, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 29, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 9, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 16, 2012EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 10, 2012EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 13, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2011EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Oct 25, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance