USPTO serial 85237044
VARITEQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VARITEQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy L Anderson
ROY L ANDERSON WAGNER, ANDERSON & BRIGHT, P.C.3541 OCEAN VIEW BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91208-1211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Cash replacement rendered by credit card; Charge card and credit card services; Credit and cash card services; Credit and debit card services; Credit card and debit card services; Credit card and payment card services; Credit card authorization services; Credit card payment processing services; Credit card services; Credit card transaction processing services; Credit card verification; Debit card services; Electronic credit card transactions; Financial administration of electronic payment transactions and customer loyalty rewards programs; Financial services, namely, administration of transactions involving funds drawn from securities, stocks, funds, equities, bonds, cash, or other types of financial investments in retirement plans using a credit or debit card over a global data network; Financial services, namely, credit agencies featuring credit processing, namely, credit checking, credit analyzing, and financial reporting services; Financial services, namely, funding online cash accounts from prepaid cash cards, bank accounts and credit card accounts; Fraud reimbursement services in the field of credit card purchases; Issuance of credit cards; Issuing credit cards; Issuing of credit cards; Issuing stored value cards; On-line banking services featuring electronic alerts that alert credit and debit card users when a single transaction exceeds a certain amount; Payment processing services, namely, credit card and debit card transaction processing services; Pre-paid purchase card services, namely, processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; Pre-paid purchase card services, namely, processing electronic payments through pre-paid cards; Processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; Providing cash and other rebates for credit card use as part of a customer loyalty program; Providing electronic processing of ACH and credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments; Providing rebates at participating establishments of others through use of a membership card; Provision and financial administration of a debit card savings program; Stored value card services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |